Taylor Article In Todays Paper
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-21 2:41 PM (#43838)
Subject: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Check this out ...

Top of the page Bottom of the page
stonebobbo
Posted 2008-04-21 2:44 PM (#43839 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307

Location: Tennessee
Yellow journalism, I tell 'ya ...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BT717
Posted 2008-04-21 3:23 PM (#43840 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 2711

Location: Vernon CT
Hey Tupperware,
Did R.T. do something to you as a child? :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
maxdaddy7271
Posted 2008-04-21 3:25 PM (#43841 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2006
Posts: 482

Location: enid, ok
I take it that the viagra commercials will be involved in a seperate lawsuit.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-21 3:28 PM (#43842 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
only if they can "get up" the legal fees . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
gulfcoast
Posted 2008-04-21 3:47 PM (#43843 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 1330

Location: ms
OK AL give him a month off......for being a trouble maker. Tupp is like one of those people that talk bad about gay people then wind up being gay, not that theres anything wrong with that.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-21 4:27 PM (#43844 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Hey, I'm just reporting what I read in the newspaper. I'm just the messenger.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
PEZ
Posted 2008-04-21 4:33 PM (#43845 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
July 2003
Posts: 3111

Location: Nashville TN.
it does sum it up
overpriced and underperform.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-21 4:33 PM (#43846 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
We got a guy at church that wants to join the band and he plays Taylors. Think it would un-Christian-like of me to show him this?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2008-04-21 4:36 PM (#43847 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
Originally posted by moody, p.i.:
Think it would un-Christian-like of me to show him this?
I think it should be mandatory.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark in Boise
Posted 2008-04-21 4:42 PM (#43848 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759

Location: Boise, Idaho
That newspaper needs a new proofreader. Where do I apply for the job?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-21 4:47 PM (#43849 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Whoa, whoa, whoa... Just a minute there.
Are you a member of Proofreaders Unanimous?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark in Boise
Posted 2008-04-21 5:36 PM (#43850 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759

Location: Boise, Idaho
Is that some sort of laber onion?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BT717
Posted 2008-04-21 5:43 PM (#43851 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 2711

Location: Vernon CT
Mark,
That was so funy it made me cry!! The Onion that is. :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-21 5:52 PM (#43852 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by moody, p.i.:
We got a guy at church that wants to join the band and he plays Taylors. Think it would un-Christian-like of me to show him this?
Paul, I wouldn't do it. But you SHOULD tell him that every member of the band has to have a stage name, and his is "D-Cubed".

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-21 6:08 PM (#43853 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Originally posted by Mark in Boise:
Is that some sort of laber onion?
We tried to join the brotherhood of leeks but they filed a stinking lawsuit and we lost on a peel.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BT717
Posted 2008-04-21 6:22 PM (#43854 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 2711

Location: Vernon CT
Your killing me with this humor!!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MWoody
Posted 2008-04-21 6:46 PM (#43855 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13996

Location: Upper Left USA
You should have turned the page over... it get's better!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-21 6:57 PM (#43856 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Mr. Prepak?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mark in Boise
Posted 2008-04-21 7:20 PM (#43857 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759

Location: Boise, Idaho
That was Al's predecessor.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beggin
Posted 2008-04-21 7:55 PM (#43858 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 2241

Location: Simpsonville, SC
Ddd..aaammmn Woody, LMAO!

Fan of Mr. Big
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MWoody
Posted 2008-04-21 7:56 PM (#43859 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13996

Location: Upper Left USA
And why would they spell his name correctly in his five minutes of fame?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-21 8:29 PM (#43860 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
We might as well go the whole nine yards. I found this in some members gallery. Geez.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
FlicKreno aka Solid Top
Posted 2008-04-21 8:43 PM (#43861 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
April 2006
Posts: 2491

Location: Copenhagen Denmark
Al , this is going too far...

Vic
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-21 8:51 PM (#43862 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Hey, that's not my picture. I found it in somebody else's member gallery !

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2008-04-21 9:15 PM (#43863 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Funny though.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stonebobbo
Posted 2008-04-21 9:21 PM (#43864 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307

Location: Tennessee
Think there's a thread on this over at AGF yet?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
couchflyer
Posted 2008-04-21 9:43 PM (#43865 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2006
Posts: 186

Location: The State of Hockey
Dave, what are you trying to tell us?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MusicMishka
Posted 2008-04-21 11:20 PM (#43866 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567

Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
Open Invitation: To any OFC member: Any day, Any Month, Any Time: come and play one of mine: I dare ya!
1998 615 custombuilt w/Brazilian Rosewood
1998 W-65: Highly figured Claro Walnut,Back,top,sides
2006 810 Fall Limited: Madagasgar Rosewood
This is such BS: you have not played or heard what a Taylor can do in the hands of someone who can properly adjust the Expression system if plugged in or really experience the acoustic sound if not: and not in some music store either! Seriously: I dare ya!
If they didn't kick butt I wouldn't own them or waste my time with them! Ask some of the attendees at the 1st Southern Jam last year:
or just continue to be lemmings!
Invitation stands!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MusicMishka
Posted 2008-04-21 11:27 PM (#43867 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567

Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
BTW, I also own some of the finest Ovation and Adamas instruments made as well as a few other great guitars: You can like what ever you want to and hate whatever you choose: just be fair and try and experience the best (not the bottom end or the middle runs but the top drawer stuff!) Call before you come please!

(And yes, the pain meds are kicking in really good tonight!)

:cool:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-21 11:35 PM (#43868 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Mikey, I think most of the comments here are directed towards the cost/value ratio of Taylors. They are certainly fine guitars and I've played some that I have liked very much.

But they cost a lot for what you get. I can spend $2500-$3000 and buy a Taylor that's a very nice, good quality instrument. Or I can spend $1200-$1500 and buy something else that will certainly compete with it. And I'm not thinking specifically of Ovations and Adamii. For $1500 or less, you can buy a great Larivee. Even Seagull makes great guitars in that price range.

But even tho' I've played some Taylors that I thought were good guitars, by and large, most of them just don't talk to me. It doesn't mean they are bad guitars, it just means that they are not for me.....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MusicMishka
Posted 2008-04-21 11:46 PM (#43869 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567

Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
Paul, I respect that and I agree to a point: everybody has their likes and dislikes: There are a lot of great guitars out there that cost less: but seriously, if I had to pay retail I would not have half of the guitars I own no matter the brand...(there are bargains to be had if one looks and is patient)...I just think that to bash a brand because they're expensive: well it's not fair if you haven't really played a good one: and there are bad ones I agree: my baby Taylor is a piece of crap: Mahogany top and all...but it fits in the overhead bin when I go overseas...I don't hope to change anybody's preferences: but if anyone is in the neighborhood: call and come over and I'll set you up! Then decide for yourself: not just because someone thinks otherwise.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 12:32 AM (#43870 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
See there? It was a boring Monday and I managed to spice things up a bit around here. Don't all thank me at once.



What's the point? Just that I dislike Taylor guitars and everything about them. And for no good reason. I'm sure tons and tons of them are way better than any guitar I'll ever own. Doesn't matter. It could be the very best sounding, playing, looking guitar I've ever come in contact with. I'd still dislike it just because it said Taylor on it. Yes, I am an ignorant, bigoted, biased, misinformed meathead. But I'll never candy coat it. I am what I am, and there's no way on Al Gore's green earth that any Taylor guitar will ever find it's way into my house. Ain't gonna happen.

I have no idea why I feel compelled to broadcast my disdain for Taylors so publically. Not my intent to piss anyone off. We all love and hate what we love and hate for reasons that are only meaningful to us. And sometimes we have no idea what the reasons are.

Peace,

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
LBJ
Posted 2008-04-22 2:21 AM (#43871 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2007
Posts: 665

Location: Tychy, Poland
i think Tupperware want us to forgot that he actually liked one Taylor once, and he can't live with it.
BTW, great picture on 1st page (that with baptist church) it made my day :-)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MusicMishka
Posted 2008-04-22 2:29 AM (#43872 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567

Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
Yes Dave my friend, true enough: but...that's why we love ya dude!

You know how to yank my chain...we've been down this road several times...but it's cool...it's still a big world and there's room to disagree...

In the meantime, C'mon over and play the '48 for a while: I'll leave the Taylors in the cases...

BTW: I really do have a hankering for a Froggy Bottom...and maybe a Ryan...maybe...someday...

:rolleyes:
Top of the page Bottom of the page
maxdaddy7271
Posted 2008-04-22 2:32 AM (#43873 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2006
Posts: 482

Location: enid, ok
Tupp, I'm with ya. I'm not an acoustic guy, but I do know this; I've played my share of electrics, and Fenders blow, whereas Gibsons suck. Value for your dollar hasn't been there for decades, and the vintage stuff is way out of reach. There are so many brands and types that far exceed the name stuff that it's insane to keep going back and dipping that well. I don't begrudge those that do, I just think they're doing themselves a major disservice. That's fine. More for us! Ovations rock!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 6:33 AM (#43874 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
This would be cruel, but fun.
Ten of us take Mike up on his offer to test drive his Taylors and no matter what everyone really thinks, state that the experience has only strengthend our disgust and revoltion for the brand.

That'd drive the poor old boy right to the edge with the rest of us "lemmings". But we would definatly stop him before he jumped.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Designzilla
Posted 2008-04-22 7:20 AM (#43875 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
December 2004
Posts: 2150

Location: Orlando, FL
Mike, I think anther part of the "Taylors suck" feeling, is the incredible smug and superior attitude many Taylor owners seem to have. Not to mention the anti-Ovation bias many of them have. When people have a "I have the best guitar and yours must suck" attitude, it doesn't really make you want to try their brand.

I've played a few Taylors I thought were nice, but never played one that I'd consider buying.

So maybe it's just that some Taylor guitars suck and some vocal Taylor owners are opinionated jerks.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2008-04-22 8:09 AM (#43876 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Bob Taylor raises trained gerbils
Top of the page Bottom of the page
gulfcoast
Posted 2008-04-22 8:12 AM (#43877 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 1330

Location: ms
Al Tupp said Al Gore, shut him down!!!!!!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 8:12 AM (#43878 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by MusicMishka:
In the meantime, C'mon over and play the '48 for a while: I'll leave the Taylors in the cases...
Now you're talking !!!

Please note that I have been very careful not to portray Taylor guitars in any way "inferior" to what I play. Or Taylor owners in any way less informed, or poorer choice makers than myself. I don't doubt for ONE SECOND that there are tons of Taylor guitars out there that completely blown away my stuff. And for the record I HAVE played some very nice Taylor guitars. But I would never ever want to own one, that's all. My Grandfather was the same way about Ford cars. He freaking HATED them. He'd rather walk to work than drive a Ford. For no logical reason, just because that's what he felt. By the way, my son owns and plays a Taylor and I have not disowned him. In fact I've posted numerous times on this board that it sounds great and is one of the best bangs for the buck out there. I just wouldn't want to own it. The intro page to this forum says "members should share their opinions", so that's what I do.

Dave

PS - One interesting thing I do notice (on the AGF Board), and Mike this IS NOT DIRECTED TOWARDS YOU, and I think others notice it as well - Taylor owners in general sure do get their panties up their cracks when you criticize their guitars. Collings to a lesser extent, but the general Taylor community just flips out at the slightest critical comment. Geez. I personally could give a crap what anyone says about my guitars. I hear all the "plastic-junk" (ovation), "jap-crap" (takamine), and "fad guitar" (martin) comments and it just rolls off my back. My guitars are only put on this earth to please ME. And they do a damn good job of it
Top of the page Bottom of the page
LBJ
Posted 2008-04-22 8:31 AM (#43879 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2007
Posts: 665

Location: Tychy, Poland
i wouldn't mind having this Taylor in my house
link
i think it could be very pleasing.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
AussieJames
Posted 2008-04-22 8:47 AM (#43880 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
June 2007
Posts: 3084

Location: Brisbane Australia
Nah!! Too highly strung :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 8:50 AM (#43881 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
Somebody tell her that she's got jizz on her eye . . .


btw;

F@ckTaylors.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 8:58 AM (#43882 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
If that's a Taylor guitar, I hate the video.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-22 9:02 AM (#43883 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Leave it to Clifford......
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 9:09 AM (#43884 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
. . I'm reining myself in.

There were a couple of comments that I WANTED t'make, that'd probably get me thrown offa' here . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ProfessorBB
Posted 2008-04-22 9:31 AM (#43885 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 5881

Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
I have a really beautiful Taylor neon sign. It is backed by a group of Gibson guitars that rarely get played any more. I'm too busy messing around at the other end of the band room where the SSBs, Vipers and VXT hang out. I'm not opposed to picking up a Taylor someday, but it is not on page one of my priority list.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2008-04-22 9:45 AM (#43886 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
My thoughts on the subject, in no particular order:

- Taylors are wonderful guitars.

- Ovation, and the rest of the industry, wish their fit and finish was half as good as Taylor's. Sorry, Ovationistas, but the best you have to offer still isn't in the same ballpark as what Taylor is producing.

- There seem to be a disproportionate number of self-important wankers among the ranks of Taylor owners. Smug is ugly.

- The "AA" battery version of the Expression System was so-so. The newer 9V version is far superior. But in both cases, the system lacks the "pop" that you get with an Ovation. Its far harder to get a Taylor to really separate itself from the mix.

- I've had the opportunity to work directly with David Hosler at Taylor. You won't find a more knowledgeable guy, or someone more committed to their customers. He is a class act 100%.

- When its all said and done, I'm still an Ovation fan at heart.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ProfessorBB
Posted 2008-04-22 9:52 AM (#43887 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 5881

Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Originally posted by Omaha:

- Ovation, and the rest of the industry, wish their fit and finish was half as good as Taylor's. Sorry, Ovationistas, but the best you have to offer still isn't in the same ballpark as what Taylor is producing.
Check out a Hamer. You'd be hard pressed to find a better built guitar in terms of quality anywhere at any price. Speaking only from the perspective of my custom model, I think Ovation is approaching the Hamer standard with their VXT line.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-22 10:49 AM (#43888 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Originally posted by Omaha:
Ovation, and the rest of the industry, wish their fit and finish was half as good as Taylor's. Sorry, Ovationistas, but the best you have to offer still isn't in the same ballpark as what Taylor is producing.
Well, maybe that's the problem. I look at Taylors and think that they make a beautiful instrument that almost qualifies as furniture. But they don't talk to me or make me feel THAT much better when I play them. That they do for a lot of people is great.

But I want a guitar that speaks to my soul when I play it, and Taylors ain't it.

To devote a whole thread to "which guitar is better" is kinda stupid. We play the guitars that make US happy, not somebody else.

When the guy who plays the Taylor comes to practice on Thursday night, I hope he plays it well because that will add to the band. And regardless of how I feel about his guitar, I'll tell him "Nice guitar". I'm certainly not going to rag on him regarding his choice of guitars (at least not much).....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 10:53 AM (#43889 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
. . . next time, just hit him over the head with it.

(what were you saying last week about "subtlety", Bill??)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
LBJ
Posted 2008-04-22 11:09 AM (#43890 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2007
Posts: 665

Location: Tychy, Poland
Ok.
1) I have played 3 Taylor guitars, so it's not a very big experience. None of them had any visible flaws or imperfections, and all looked really good. Sound wise, Taylor 414CE i've played sounds nearly as good as my Furch D40CE acoustically. But i've paid only $500 for Furch.
814 CE was nice guitar, but nothing really special. 310 was total junk.

2) Finish on Ovation - those i've seen (again - maybe 10 Ovations in Poland last year) were far behind Taylor. Every guitar had some minor imperfection, except Adamas and AD II model.

3) VXT - sounds good, looks awful. I don't think this model will be in production in 3 years.
Body shape sucks, fingerboard looks cheap and if it didn't sound like it sounds, i'd say that this is a 400$ guitar made in Korea.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 11:24 AM (#43891 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by MusicMishka:
Open Invitation: To any OFC member: Any day, Any Month, Any Time: come and play one of mine: I dare ya!
Jeff, bring the trebouchet ...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 11:54 AM (#43892 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
. . . I'll get the auger bit.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 12:07 PM (#43893 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
And the Dremel for the detail work.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
BT717
Posted 2008-04-22 12:11 PM (#43894 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 2711

Location: Vernon CT
Wow, Just got back from running erands and I'm so glad to see another "warm fuzzy" family discusion going on here. As you can all see by my Signature, I own a Taylor. First guitar in my short time playing that ever "spoke" to me. I love and would never part with it. But as you can also see, I have my share of "O"s. The second guitar Manufacturer that "speaks" to me.
If I had $3,000.00 to blow , I would love another Taylor. But bang for buck, The "O"s are hard to beat. Can we all play nice? :)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 12:11 PM (#43895 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
". . And the Dremel for the detail work . ."

Oh, yeah, . . "fit & finish" . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 12:14 PM (#43896 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
It ain't "finished" till it "fits" in a shoebox...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2008-04-22 12:20 PM (#43897 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
Originally posted by moody, p.i.:
I look at Taylors and think that they make a beautiful instrument that almost qualifies as furniture. But they don't talk to me or make me feel THAT much better when I play them.
I've never seen a piece of furniture, or even a high-end piano, that's anywhere near the Taylor finish quality. Then again, I don't shop at the "good" stores.

I hear what you are saying. I'm not saying that you should like Taylors. That's a subjective question and purely a matter of taste.

But the undeniable, objective reality is they are setting the bar for finish quality these days. When I compare any Taylor to my Koala, the Taylor comes out on top. The Koala has:

- Thick globs of finish drips inside the slothead
- A fairly rough joint between the bowl and the binding
- An overly sharp corner around the edge of the top (I eased it myself with some sandpaper).
- And not exactly a finish issue (but a "fit" issue): It took a trip back to the mothership to get the neck and intonation correct.

Those are things you just don't see on a Taylor.

All that having been said, I play the Koala every day and haven't touched my 714ce for months. And there's a reason. I like the Koala better.

But just because I prefer the guitar, doesn't mean I can't appreciate the quality that Taylor delivers. Their guitars really are well made. And when you consider their production levels, they are all the more impressive.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2008-04-22 12:20 PM (#43898 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5331

Location: Cicero, NY
Well there's 10 minutes I'll never get back.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 12:24 PM (#43899 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Like you would know what to do with it if you had it back.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 12:27 PM (#43900 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
". . . It ain't "finished" till it "fits" in a shoebox . ."


Now, THAT's Funny!!! :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2008-04-22 12:30 PM (#43901 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5331

Location: Cicero, NY
Wow - can you believe every response I have is probably grounds for dismissal?

I knew you could.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Caravan Rooubishe
Posted 2008-04-22 12:36 PM (#43902 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper
Joined:
March 2008
Posts: 119

Location: everywhere
Seems like Standing Ovation has taken over Tuppy again.
But he is right, Taylors suck (0r most of them anyway)
and Omaha is further right, the pompus selfappointed eyerectus infected misinformed hollow wankers, give other guitar players a bad name.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 12:59 PM (#43903 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Originally posted by Weaser P:
Wow - can you believe every response I have is probably grounds for dismissal?

I knew you could.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 1:20 PM (#43904 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Whoa - This is like the OFC of old. We used to have edgy banter like this all the time. No knock on the newer members but over the last few years things have gotten much more plain vanilla. I guess that's only natural. Glad we (me) stirred things up a bit. My last 3 pasos - Taylor definately builds some nice shit. And I wouldn't want to own any of it in a million years. Hal Jordan be damned.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 1:22 PM (#43905 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
". . but over the last few years things have gotten much more plain vanilla . ."

like Taylors.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2008-04-22 1:44 PM (#43906 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

I really like Hillary Clinton.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 1:51 PM (#43907 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Who cares.


...I mean, that's nice.


I hear she's running for Queen next year.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-22 1:55 PM (#43908 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Originally posted by schroeder:
I really like Hillary Clinton.
Obviously, you're not a misogynist like everybody on this side of the pond....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 2:06 PM (#43909 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
I don't know what a misogynist is but I want to be one. Hopefully it's those guys in San Angelo TX with the dozens of teen aged wives all dressed up like "American Girl" dolls. Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 2:15 PM (#43910 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Are you planning to vote for Her Thighness, Paul?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2008-04-22 2:18 PM (#43911 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
I have played a ton of taylors. I have never found one that spoke to me. not one.

I hate the expression system. Every time I play someplace and someone has one of those they take forever to set it up. my ovations just plug and play.

last week I slammed a cowboy e on my adamas and I physically saw people jump in thier seats. there was that much sound. I am oftened asked by some of the no nothing kids at the coffeehouse why my e string rings so much on "that" guitar (adamas I) I respond it is the sound of money. LOL

I also don't buy into the finger jointed headstock on taylors. sure it saves money but why no just say that. everyone knows if you cut and paste you change the integrity of the piece of wood. Although probably it makes little difference to the overall sound of the guitar.

I will keep trying but I have yet to find "that" taylor
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2008-04-22 2:26 PM (#43912 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
FWIW, they phased out the fingerjoints over the last year. The new ones have a scarf joint. Same effect. Looks better.

The fingerjoints always looked like crap to me.

But mechanically, they are fine and I can't imagine they have any effect on the tone one way or another.

At the other end, the Taylor neck joint is marvelous. In a CNC world, every maker should be doing them that way.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-22 2:31 PM (#43913 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Originally posted by alpep:
I am oftened asked by some of the no nothing kids at the coffeehouse why my e string rings so much on "that" guitar (adamas I) I respond it is the sound of money.
Best line of the day......
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stephent28
Posted 2008-04-22 2:37 PM (#43914 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303

Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066
My Taylor DDSM Doyle Dykes Signature Model is a terrific guitar. Every other Taylor I have tried sucks.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
LBJ
Posted 2008-04-22 2:40 PM (#43915 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2007
Posts: 665

Location: Tychy, Poland
unexpected Ovartion Sighting

So guys, conclusion is... Taylor guitars LACK SOUL.
EOT.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 2:55 PM (#43916 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Originally posted by stephent28:
My Taylor DDSM Doyle Dykes Signature Model is a terrific guitar.
I concur.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sligoman
Posted 2008-04-22 2:58 PM (#43917 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2007
Posts: 283

Location: Portland, OR
I have absolutely nothing to add. My partner has a Taylor. It's OK but I don't think I'd pay $2k for it. But I don't have it anyway. Looks like Hillary will win. Anyone want a bumper sticker that says "Anybody but Hillary"?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 3:04 PM (#43918 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
There are not many hard & fast rules around here but one of them is to stay clear of politics.
But thanks for the offer.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
gulfcoast
Posted 2008-04-22 3:11 PM (#43919 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 1330

Location: ms
Tupp liked my 710 Taylor we have pics to prove it. I like my just out of the shop 415CE Taylor but I can`t get that elite-T out of my mind.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 3:19 PM (#43920 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
I did like your 710 VERY much. But I still wouldn't want to own it unless you scratched the name off the headstock. Sorry.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Phil Wong
Posted 2008-04-22 3:28 PM (#43921 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
June 2003
Posts: 1792

Location: Rego Park, NY,
Originally posted by cliff:
. . I'm reining myself in.

There were a couple of comments that I WANTED t'make, that'd probably get me thrown offa' here . . .
Cliff all ya have to do is spend your month's vacation from this board at Big Al's house. He's only about an hour or so away from you isn't he?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 3:34 PM (#43922 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
TwoHours.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2008-04-22 3:42 PM (#43923 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678

Location: SoCal
Anybody here realize how silly this thread is? Tup posts a joke (at least I assume it's a joke) and it takes off from there. For everybody here who loves Taylors, nobody is saying they are bad guitars (some jerk owners, but that's another thread). Most of us are just saying that they are not our cup of tea and the reasons why.

It's kinda stupid to keep repeating the same things over and over again.

I'm going to go out and do some work (I know, the concept of "work" bothers me too). When I get back tonight, there will probably be 3 more pages of the same nonsense....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 3:53 PM (#43924 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
...to which you have only contributed an average of two posts per page. This 'work' thing seems to be slowing you down.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 3:59 PM (#43925 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
. . and the term "contribution" is even questionable . . .
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Omaha
Posted 2008-04-22 4:04 PM (#43926 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126

Location: Omaha, NE
Ovations suck and Bob Taylor craps gold nuggets.

Don't you guys know anything?

Geeze!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 4:05 PM (#43927 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
I was trying to be kind.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
cliff
Posted 2008-04-22 4:06 PM (#43928 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842

Location: NJ
so was I
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 4:13 PM (#43929 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Ouch.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 5:13 PM (#43930 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
There's a big difference between saying "Taylor guitars suck" and "I hate Taylor guitars."

The former (suck) is a statement without merit about the guitars design, sound, playability, construction, cosmetics, etc. Without some benchmark or metric this is a rediculus statement. I've slipped and said it myself, but I try to be careful about such meaningless and arbitrary statements.

The later (hate) is a completely valid personal opinion about Taylor guitars. It needs no explanation, can not be second guessed and carries meaning only to the person saying it (me).

OK, I'm predicting we can hit 7 pages. Unless someone goes over the line and we get shut down.
Onward-ho

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2008-04-22 5:21 PM (#43931 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
that's it tuppy
you can't mention ho's

I am shutting this down
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 5:42 PM (#43932 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
What? Al, your killing it at only 4 pages?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 5:45 PM (#43933 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Ho, ho!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 6:00 PM (#43934 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Waskel, you can't say that. You'll get us shut down.

They are Personal Fornification Consultants.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2008-04-22 6:02 PM (#43935 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5331

Location: Cicero, NY
Ho boy :rolleyes: ...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
schroeder
Posted 2008-04-22 6:04 PM (#43936 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2004
Posts: 4413

I'm thinking about becoming a Buddhist.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Waskel
Posted 2008-04-22 6:08 PM (#43937 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840

Location: closely held secret
Originally posted by Weaser P:
Ho boy :rolleyes: ...
Not that there's anything wrong with that...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 6:20 PM (#43938 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Stand by... I wanna check out something.
.
.
.
.
I was just over to the Tak site and my suspicions are correct. Tuppy does not cause havoc over there like he does over here.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2008-04-22 6:50 PM (#43939 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5331

Location: Cicero, NY
I'm following you here, Brad. You're saying that DAVE is the one who should convert to Buddhism.

Interesting...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tupperware
Posted 2008-04-22 7:16 PM (#43940 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
January 2005
Posts: 4903

Location: Phoenix AZ
Originally posted by Slipkid:
I was just over to the Tak site and my suspicions are correct. Tuppy does not cause havoc over there like he does over here.
Good observation - I think of it as different outlets for different moods. I pay $24. a month for the Tak site so I'm sure not gonna pollute it with the vile filth that I spew over here.

Dave
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Weaser P
Posted 2008-04-22 7:18 PM (#43941 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
October 2005
Posts: 5331

Location: Cicero, NY
Well thank Hillary for THAT!

(whoops)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Caravan Rooubishe
Posted 2008-04-22 7:47 PM (#43942 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper
Joined:
March 2008
Posts: 119

Location: everywhere
I would love to get a bunch of those anybody but Hillary stickers. Put me down for a hundred.
And then two hundred more that I can cut off the Hillary part and put it over O'Bamalam. As well as old man McCain.


What we NEED is Mr. Big to run for President.
Then we'll have Ovations in the white house and he can pass a law that says Taylor owners suck and not allowed to play.
Just think Al, you could probably get pretty good shipping rates selling the gear from the White House, dontcha think?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
stonebobbo
Posted 2008-04-22 8:02 PM (#43943 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307

Location: Tennessee
Mr. Big could could decree from the Roundback Office that he could institute a new military/industrial complex that uses the US Air Force to drop-ship the Ovation boxes ... with their laser targeting systems. And I can see his campaign slogan now ... "Drop Bims Not Bombs".
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 9:07 PM (#43944 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Originally posted by Tupperware:
Good observation - I think of it as different outlets for different moods.
Dave [/QB]
Two wise old sayings come to mind...
1) The fish always goes to where the bait is.
2) Don't poo where you sleep. (I've got a new puppy ya know).
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2008-04-22 9:37 PM (#43945 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
you mean spoo, don't you?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Slipkid
Posted 2008-04-22 9:42 PM (#43946 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
September 2003
Posts: 9301

Location: south east Michigan
Oh yes... I mis-spoke. :D
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeff W.
Posted 2008-04-22 9:48 PM (#43947 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2003
Posts: 11039

Location: Earth·SolarSystem·LocalInterstellarCloud·Local Bub
Bob Taylor gives Ed Asner Full-Brazilians.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2008-04-22 10:04 PM (#43948 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
you guys crack me up.


when atm's started my bank was forcing you to use them for deposits so I would write "hire humans not machines" on the bank envelopes.

it got back to one of the vice presidents of the bank....she happened to be my aunt....she was not pleased with me....I got cut out of the will
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beggin
Posted 2008-04-23 12:51 AM (#43949 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 2241

Location: Simpsonville, SC
...a small (maybe) price to pay for individualism.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2008-04-23 8:39 AM (#43950 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Time to choose another bank.

Sorry to hear about the will thing there Mr. Big.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
alpep
Posted 2008-04-23 9:03 AM (#43951 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper


Joined:
December 2001
Posts: 10583

Location: NJ
Originally posted by Mauvais Beal:
Time to choose another bank.

Sorry to hear about the will thing there Mr. Big.
no big deal...

I later found out it was my cousins that cut me out of the will by having a bedridden woman sign an altered version of the original.

cest le vie
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Beal
Posted 2008-04-23 9:09 AM (#43952 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127

Location: 6 String Ranch
Now that's the typical way they do it. Not very imaginative but effective.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MWoody
Posted 2008-04-23 11:00 AM (#43953 - in reply to #43838)
Subject: Re: Taylor Article In Todays Paper



Joined:
December 2003
Posts: 13996

Location: Upper Left USA
"All the News that fits" comes to mind.

I never could understand buddhism. How can you learn discipline from a 400 pound jobless dude that smiles all the time and tells the Hot dog Vender "make me one with everything"?
Top of the page Bottom of the page