1537 vs 1768
bvince
Posted 2009-09-29 3:01 AM (#396599)
Subject: 1537 vs 1768



Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3620

Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :)
Is the bracing or top construction different between the 1537 and the 1768? Any comments on the sound comparisons?

I have had both but not at the same time, and I have been impressed by the sound quality and volume of both. Does anyone here own both models?

I actually just answered one of my own question by checking the Ovation web site. Quintad bracing on the 1768 and I believe fan bracing on the 1537 (it's not listed, but I seem to remember that on my guitar). Both are listed as having the deep bowl, but I kinda' wonder if they used the deeper Adamas bowl on the 1537? If so, perhaps that along with the additional ply under the upper bout gave it such a nice range of tonal qualities?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gallerinski
Posted 2009-09-29 9:30 AM (#396600 - in reply to #396599)
Subject: Re: 1537 vs 1768
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996

Location: Phoenix AZ
Same basic bracing pattern, maybe some very small differences. Quintad is long braces that take advantage of the fact that there is no center hole. Fan is similar but has to skirt around the center hole and has a cross brace. There would be no sense in having fan bracing on a non-center hole guitar (in my opinion). In my opinion the reason the 1537 sounds so much better than a regular Elite is the ply addition to the top.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2009-09-29 9:36 AM (#396601 - in reply to #396599)
Subject: Re: 1537 vs 1768


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15682

Location: SoCal
The bowl on the Adamas is the same as on the other deep bowl guitars. It's the mounting ring that gives it slightly more depth....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bvince
Posted 2009-09-29 9:52 AM (#396602 - in reply to #396599)
Subject: Re: 1537 vs 1768



Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3620

Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :)
Oh ... Thanks for all the good scoop. I wonder why they steered away from the ply addition? Perhaps the idea of a layer of "ply" would make somebody say it wasn't a "solid" top. My other question was - Why does the 1537 seem to be so much heavier?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
moody, p.i.
Posted 2009-09-29 10:01 AM (#396603 - in reply to #396599)
Subject: Re: 1537 vs 1768


Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15682

Location: SoCal
Should be about the same weight. Both have a K-Bar in the neck which is heavy. Maybe the 2 knobber electronics weigh more?
Top of the page Bottom of the page