|
|
 Joined: December 2003 Posts: 13996
Location: Upper Left USA | It is lovely to have the ebony in there but also wasteful. How about a Titanium rod"? |
|
| |
|
 Joined: January 2002 Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | The narrower is mostly for looks, doesn't save any money. I think ebony is good too. Afterall isnb't guitar building all about depleating our natural resourses? Use up that Ebony and Brazilian Rosewood and Black Walnut and Honduran Mahogony. Let's use up all the Spruce trees.
THEN, we will all hvae to play Qs. That's a nice thought! |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 14842
Location: NJ | . . . where do I sign up?? |
|
| |
|
 Joined: December 2003 Posts: 13996
Location: Upper Left USA | Once again I bow to Bill's superior mental powers! I am not worthy :rolleyes: |
|
| |
|
Joined: March 2002 Posts: 15678
Location: SoCal | Well, hell, Woodrow, we've often said that you're not worthy (altho' I was playing the Guitar Formerly Known As Viper last night -- I might have to rethink that "not worthy" comment)..... |
|
| |
|
Joined: July 2003 Posts: 1922
Location: Canton (Detroit), MI | Yes, I didn't think the narrower 5-piece neck would save any money. Assembling 5 pieces is assembling 5 pieces, and narrower might actually be HARDER to assemble than a little thicker. I personally prefer the thicker stripe, myself. My favorite stripe is on my 2002 Collectors, with my 1777 Legend a close second.
I'm waiting for us to hurriedly use up all the good top wood so that the carbon fiber top will work its way down into Ovations(we can use old pallets for Celeb and Applause tops).
Roger |
|
| |