|
|
Joined:
July 2009
Posts: 26
| Why haven't the Ovation 'Q' guitars been released by Ovation as part of their standard product line?
R&D on the 'Q' guitar has apparently been going on for many years, but a 'Q' model has never been made widely available to the public.
Has anyone every played a 'Q', and if so, what are they like, and could you compare and contrast the sound of these instruments to other Adamases?
Thanks.
Al |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | There were two versions of the "Q" guitar. Once was in production for a bit, characterized by wavy sound holes.
The other is a dream many of us keep hoping comes true. I got to play two different ones last year. In a word, they are stunning ... there is no comparison to other Adamii. I would love to see these made with a contour bowl ... but I think the price would make it a non-starter for the company. How many $10K guitars could Ovation really sell? That's why they never got put into production in the first place. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 3969
| Originally posted by Albert190:
Why haven't the Ovation 'Q' guitars been released by Ovation as part of their standard product line? Deemed too expensive to produce.
Has anyone every played a 'Q', and if so, what are they like, and could you compare and contrast the sound of these instruments to other Adamases? Farcking amazing. 'Nuf said. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 5881
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains | A number of us have played both prototypes, No.s 8 and 20 I believe, thanks to the kindnes and generosity of their owner. I doubt I could ever afford one if the factory ever did make a limited production run, but I'd certainly spend some time with a pencil running my numbers in an attempt to make it happen. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | 8 an 10
truely the ultimate of any standard |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | The Q's are #8 and #10.
edit, Beal beat me to it.
I believe a certain banjo player mentioned the whereabouts of #9. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
July 2009
Posts: 26
| One would think, though, that if the 'Q' were sold in sufficient quantities, Ovation would not not have to charge $10K for each guitar to make a reasonable profit.
If they priced the 'Q', say a thousand dollars (or so) more than a standard Adamas, I'm sure there would be tremendous interest on the part of the public in buying these guitars, especially if they really are far superior to the other Adamases.
By selling large numbers of these 'Q' guitars, Ovation could keep the price down and still make a substantial profit.
Al |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Al, I'm guessing the Q cost significantly more to produce than a standard Adamas.
It's most likely not about making a big profit. It's about selling enough to pay for the production costs. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3620
Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :) | What on earth would make them that expensive to produce? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
July 2009
Posts: 26
| Stonebobbo:
When you wrote:
'There were two versions of the "Q" guitar. Once was in production for a bit, characterized by wavy sound holes.'
How did the above guitars sound?
Also, how much did they cost?
Thanks.
Al |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2006
Posts: 3969
| After meeting the much higher production costs, you also have to consider the marketing aspect. Assuming a production cost of even $5000 (probably lower than the actual), how many people would actually buy an Ovation/Adamas for $6-7K? That's some pretty rarified air...
You can find the production version on occasion. Not much different than any other cross-weave Adamas, and nowhere near the "true" Qs. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Temp with Q10:
T28 with Q8:
 |
|
| |
|
Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3620
Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :) | The only thing I don't like so far about them is the name "Q" guitar.
What does the name "Q" stand for anyway? ... on the other hand, maybe I shouldn't ask. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Originally posted by Albert190:
How did the above guitars sound?
Like a CA with tone and soul.
Originally posted by Albert190:
Also, how much did they cost? I felt the need to ask - therefore, I didn't bother. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2008
Posts: 2683
Location: Hot Springs, S.D. | Oh great, another one to long for. :rolleyes: It's probably a very good thing these are not available. I can't AFFORD to keep buying guitars like I have been.
Now...does anyone have one of these for sale? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 1567
Location: Indiana | I don't question the experienced voices here that point to cost when ever this subject comes up.
I am curious though as to what aspects/techniques of Q production make it drastically more costly than the all composite guitars produced by CA and Rainsong. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | Originally posted by Albert190:
Stonebobbo:
When you wrote:
'There were two versions of the "Q" guitar. Once was in production for a bit, characterized by wavy sound holes.'
How did the above guitars sound?
Also, how much did they cost?
Thanks.
Al Here's a link that describes the guitar: Adamas Q597
I never played one of these, but I'm willing to bet they sounded real similar to the W597s.
Street price on these were in the $2K range. They ocassionally show up on eBay and can be had for a bit less than that. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2006
Posts: 5881
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains | No. 8 and 10, which is what I meant. Chalk it up to clumsy typing. If my memory is correct, I believe I heard that the true Q prototypes are all one piece, meaning the necks, tops and bowls are all fused together and cannot come apart. This is certainly the way they look under close inspection. On the production models, aren't the necks and the manner in which they are attached standard issue Adamas? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
November 2005
Posts: 1126
Location: Omaha, NE | Originally posted by Jonmark Stone:
I don't question the experienced voices here that point to cost when ever this subject comes up.
I am curious though as to what aspects/techniques of Q production make it drastically more costly than the all composite guitars produced by CA and Rainsong. Me too.
I spent some time playing a lovely CA GX model last week. Lovely guitar. Great tone and volume. Effortless playability. And of course its totally bulletproof. Street price is something like $2700 or so.
What makes the Q so much more expensive? |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2008
Posts: 2985
Location: Sydney, Australia | If any one from Ovation/Fender is listening to this thread, I believe the Q would make a great loss leader for the company. i.e. sell them for less than what they cost, but more than others, say around $7-8k.
Don't advertise them outside the Ovation website, but let them filter out into the world where people see them, have a play, then decide they can't afford it and buy another Ovation/Adamas. This concept is used in other industries, where they don't expect to sell many of the top-of-the-line model, but use them to create brand name respect which leads to sales of lesser models. e.g. Honda/Acura had the NSX which never sold many, but raised brand cred.
Maybe by doing this they'll stumble on a way to reduce costs without losing that Q mojo that people rave about. I've never tried one, but I'd like to. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2005
Posts: 120
Location: Gardnerville, NV | Don't advertise them outside the Ovation website, but let them filter out into the world where people see them, have a play, then decide they can't afford it and buy another Ovation/Adamas. This concept is used in other industries, where they don't expect to sell many of the top-of-the-line model, but use them to create brand name respect which leads to sales of lesser models. e.g. Honda/Acura had the NSX which never sold many, but raised brand cred. sounds like how they currently market Adamas in general |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | or all Ovation for that matter.
Anyhow, the "Q"s were three piece, a top and bowl that were joined half way down the side and a neck-through. Add to that a fingerboard, bridge and braces and tuners and you got a gitter.
I know where 8 and 10 are. DJ, the former head of R&D has one, maybe #9?
I don't know of any others but there may be one or two.
I don't know if it ever got far enough to have a real price.
The Q2 is just a wavey hole adamas and unless you're a fan of that non-hetro hole pattern I say just get a SMT or one of the others. From Al of course. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 1567
Location: Indiana | Interesting. Thanks Beal. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | The Q was in the price list for 1 year only. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | I thought DeBanjo said he had #9. |
|
| |
Ovation 'Q' Guitars - Why Aren't They Available As Part of Standard Product Line?
