|
|
Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 14842
Location: NJ | I once asked Al Stewart why (after playing Ovations "live" for so long) he suddenly switched to Taylor.
He told me:
" . . It was Laurence Juber (who played on a few of Stewart's albums) that convinced me that Ovations were shit, and that Taylors were much better instruments . . "
Even if it WAS his, he DESERVES to have "lost" it. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678
Location: SoCal | Originally posted by playadamas:
May I ask how many other members have an Ovation/Adamas wide neck of any kind? Please stick with only O/A's. Thank you. Specify non-nylong string.
FD-14.... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2002
Posts: 15678
Location: SoCal | Originally posted by stephent28:
Originally posted by stonebobbo:
Stephen ... did I tell you that I talked to Lawrence Juber in the Martin booth at NAMM for a while. We about about #57 for a few minutes. He said he doesn't remember selling that guitar and wondered what happened to it. He also said "that guitar is on a lot of hit records". Now that's really cool. Wish I had been with you to hear all that. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2006
Posts: 6268
Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast | Originally posted by playadamas:
Ovation/Adamas wide neck of any kind? 1614-1 Folklore '78
FD-14 Folklore Limited, at MS for new top
1680 Adamas
1689-7 '78, rode hard, had MS neck reset and fret job |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2005
Posts: 11840
Location: closely held secret | Originally posted by moody, p.i.:
Originally posted by stephent28:
Originally posted by stonebobbo:
Stephen ... did I tell you that I talked to Lawrence Juber in the Martin booth at NAMM for a while. We about about #57 for a few minutes. He said he doesn't remember selling that guitar and wondered what happened to it. He also said "that guitar is on a lot of hit records". Now that's really cool. Wish I had been with you to hear all that. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | Originally posted by MusicMishka:
Played this tonight and felt much better: 1978 1687-8 #119
Accept No Substitutes!
sigh.... :rolleyes: |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | Mike, that's a GREAT photo. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2009
Posts: 602
Location: Hanau, Hessen, Germany | Originally posted by playadamas:
May I ask how many other members have an Ovation/Adamas wide neck of any kind? Please stick with only O/A's. Thank you. I have widenecks only.
The Folklore 1614 - 1 7/8
The Folklore Deluxe FD14 1 3/4
The U681-T - 1 3/4
I never bonded with anything slighter than 1 3/4 and I probably never will :rolleyes: |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 5567
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains | 1978 1687-8 #119
-
Accept No Substitutes!
sigh.... [Roll Eyes]
That one's a wide neck? WOW. Nice score when you snagged that one!
I posted it not to "show me yours if I show you mine"...I just wanted to share a picture of a guitar that would bring a similar response from me as Michael felt when he sold his...wide neck, regular neck...no matter to me...I own both but presently, not an Adamas wideneck...and I'm absolutely fine with that... |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759
Location: Boise, Idaho | Folklore, Ute, Lav Koa 12 fret,Classic (1713) and the Country Artist that's for sale. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
February 2002
Posts: 5750
Location: Scotland | Originally posted by stonebobbo:
Stephen ... did I tell you that I talked to Lawrence Juber in the Martin booth at NAMM for a while. We about about #57 for a few minutes. He said he doesn't remember selling that guitar and wondered what happened to it. He also said "that guitar is on a lot of hit records". Some confusion here. #57 belonged to Jimmy McCulloch, not Juber. McCulloch died in '79, and Juber replaced him in Wings. When I saw #57 in London it must have been early to mid-1980. A dealer had #57 and several other guitars from the McCulloch estate for sale. I doubt Juber even saw it, let alone played it |
|
| |
|
Joined:
January 2002
Posts: 14127
Location: 6 String Ranch | Paul, When I met Juber at Abbey Road when we were hanging out with the other Paul, you know, what's his name, Juber did have one that he'd been playing. This was when they were recording Rocestra. Don't know the number. I always figgered that all that stuff was McCartney's and they just used it. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2009
Posts: 686
Location: Route 66, just east of the Cadillac Ranch | Originally posted by Nick B.:
Originally posted by playadamas:
May I ask how many other members have an Ovation/Adamas wide neck of any kind? Please stick with only O/A's. Thank you. 2008-5
1689-8
1111-4 (at MS being refitted with 1 3/4" neck)
My apologies to anyone that rushed out to buy a 2008-5 wide neck. :) |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | As far as I am concerned a 1 3/4" and a 1 7/8" neck would be considered wide necks vs the standard 1 11/16. A 2" neck is not a wide neck, it is a classical neck.
What kind and wise person told you otherwise cause I definitely disagree. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 8307
Location: Tennessee | Originally posted by Paul Templeman:
Some confusion here. My bad, Paul. I never actually mentioned #57 to Juber, we just talked about the "Adamas slothead" ... so Juber could have been thinking about the other one. But I thought I had seen a picture of him (courtesy of Samova) playing the 57 when that guitar came onto the market about a year ago.
Originally posted by MusicMishka:
As the caption clearly says: 1687-8... Again, my bad. I'm not real good with what all of the secret code numbers mean, especially on the Adamas line which doesn't seem to map well to the Ovation line. Since everyone else were posting pictures and talking about wideneck O's and A's, I assumed you also were showing us a wideneck. Now I get what you were doing. Sorry about that. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | There is no hard and fast definition of "wide neck". Most builders like Collings, Martin, etc. would consider 1-3/4 to be standard. Anything small is a narrow neck and anything larger is a wide neck.
Ovations are mostly targeted towards female players so traditionally Ovation has considered 1-11/16 to be standard and anything bigger to be a wide neck. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
September 2005
Posts: 3619
Location: GATLINBURG TENNESSEE :) | All I know is that since I picked up a couple "wider" necks, I spend a lot more time playing THEM, and I can really tell the difference. It is amazing how much easier it is to play fingerstyle with that little extra. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2002
Posts: 398
Location: So. Cal. | For those who might be interested, the trade has been completed. Both guitars arrived at their new homes safe and sound (save a small hiccup with the 1689 case, but it was unharmed).
Stephen, my "long lost friend" came back as if it never left (really a different guitar, but same exact model). It was actually quite emotional as I held it, tuned it up and played it until its ringing filled the room.
As for the 1689, the new host seems to be happy so far. But give it some more time and maybe you'll hear from him directly.
Thanks again everybody, for listening. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
April 2004
Posts: 13303
Location: Latitude 39.56819, Longitude -105.080066 | Awesome! I love happy endings. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
August 2004
Posts: 709
Location: Germany | 1689-7 #325
1689-9 #2576
1682-7 #1570 (wide neck Adamas II)
Josh White
Karl |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2008
Posts: 1455
Location: Texas | Originally posted by Gallerinski:
Ovations are mostly targeted towards female players so traditionally Ovation has considered 1-11/16 to be standard and anything bigger to be a wide neck. Thanks for convincing the thousands of teenage boys who come here looking for information about Ovations that they are “girly” guitars. ;)
I don’t know if you made that statement based on inside knowledge of Ovation’s secret marketing strategy, personal speculation or simply to bait us, but I will bite:
I believe that the 1-11/16” nut-width has been Ovation’s “standard” for over 40 years, the implication that it was designed for female players and the converse assumption that it is too narrow for the average male player seems quite absurd to me, how did you reach that conclusion?
Also, many, many guitarists (regardless of gender) who play the most popular solid-body electric guitars find that they can transition to an Ovation acoustic easily, because Ovations feel and play very much like an electric.
Despite the fact that I think you were being intentionally flippant, someone looking for information might read your comment and conclude that Ovations are less desirable because of the nut-width, when, in fact, they may well be more desirable for the majority of players.
…just my 2¢… |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | Didn't say anything about ovations being undesirable. Just the contrary. They are extremely popular. I dare anyone to go into a Guitar Centre and NOT find an ovation guitar. Yes ovation's standard nut width for decades has been 1-11/16, with a few wider thrown in. Other makers are just the opposite, 1-3/4 is the standard and they'll offer some smaller. Ones not better than the other. Yes ovation has a significantly higher percentage of endorsees who are female than other makers. I learned this just by looking at their lists on their own websites. 40% of ovation signature models are named after females. There is nothing at all wrong with that. By comparison another random maker I checked (Martin) is 13%, and another (Takamine) is 15%. It's just an observation based on publically available facts, that's all. I didn't check Taylor but I would guess their percent of female endorsees is not small. I doubt very seriously that my statements will scare teenage boys away from ovation. There is always the Mick Thomson model to draw them in. Back to nutwidth, it's just a personal preference that each of us have to find the guitar (nut) that is most comfortable to us. I have a couple of each and they all do the job for which they were purchased. |
|
| |
|
Joined:
December 2008
Posts: 1455
Location: Texas | Gallerinski,
I respect your opinion, but I don't agree with your conclusion that Ovation "targets women" just because currently 40% of the tiny number of signature models happen to bear women's autographs. That 40% is also a relatively recent development, yet you implied that Ovation "traditionally" targeted women, which could be interpreted as saying that the standard neck was not appropriate for the average male hands, which is not true.
Plus, does the gender of the spokesperson really determine if the guitar is "for" you? I hope the primary objective in signing-up artists for signature models is that they are respected guitar players, regardless of gender.
My point was simply that potential new Ovation buyers might read this thread and get the incorrect impression that Ovations are designed for a particular gender or that their standard necks are too small for "male hands" or something crazy like that. I think that is misinformation. Ovation "standard" necks are perfect for most "standard" hands, male or female.
Yes, if someone has extremely large hands with fat fingertips, maybe they can only play a wide-neck, but I think that wide-necks are more "targeted" for a certain style of playing than for any particular gender or even hand size.
…up to 4¢, sorry… |
|
| |
|
Joined:
May 2008
Posts: 4996
Location: Phoenix AZ | Nothing wrong with your opinion.
Hey only 6 more cents and you can get a cup of coffee! |
|
| |
|
Joined:
March 2005
Posts: 12759
Location: Boise, Idaho | The contour bowl is for today's guys. It might fit a pregnant gal, but I think it is definitely targeted toward guys.
Where can I get that cup of coffee for 10 cents? |
|
| |
RE: bidding adieu to a good friend
